The 2G scam case verdict augment questions on certain journalistic based expose contents too
At the end of the day, evidence would be lacking. But I am confident with Narada Sting, accused and culprits will have the same meaning. Because, those who were caught in our camera had admitted receiving the BRIBE!
Before getting to the said, I would like to give a thought to sting operation molded journalism. Umpteen number of professionals believe this mode of journalism to be unethical and bait. Fair, if so, what happened within the matter of 2G spectrum reporting? Hope it was because Journos were busy 'throwing presumptive sensational corrosive numbers' to the public on documented records and audio tapes deep-rooting 2G scam case. What all was the eve...! money laundering, Siphoning and so on. Apex court of India ordered CBI probe, and at the germinal, prosecution counsel held Justice Uday Lalit, the then Judge of the Supreme Court. After all this way up and down, zig and zag...What came out to the final?
Special Judge OP Saini of the CBI Special Court constituted by the Supreme Court was found religiously discharging his duty. He waited in his duty all the day from sunrise to sunset. He even did not avail the leave for national holidays or any such vacations. All this was in hope to be breezed in with some solid legal evidence. Alas! Nothing happened. Oral imaginative theories can't ever be reckoned as legal notes, so the matter was yet continued to linger. Many presumptive theories logged in with government classified documents were followed copiously in our media fraternity. But as long as no admissible evidence could be validated in the court, to the tug nonentity is set.
All the way long, I was not intending to say that 2G scam was nothing that happened, and I sense a hard stuff in the matter. It was not at any cost a corruption less deal. The miscue was on estimating the ken to be so easy to be counted on, which are too smart more than our probing sleuths. While they pave new channels to rectify their deeds, the investigative army should possess more high technical gadgets by which they can mark it sure to booby trap the red hands.
Take the instance of the Tehelka Sting operation. I was responsible to expose, it was my duty to.Many faces, many intentions, and many talks. All longed to bribe and benefits. How the investigation carried on was later approved by the mass indeed. Every one we pointed out was punished and for some, trials are going on. Voluntarily admitted easy talks on deals and wheels can't be fixed anywhere. CBI won't take the vain of prolonging with a file without any evidence. But if set with any grains, they are to tear the tug! Bofors says it all! Accused, involved and those who raised the cabal are no more seen. In our country, corruption is hard to be proved before the Goddess of Law. And if the accused is a part of the ruling team, he/she has got much option to abdicate the fog. Pillar documents could be altered in ease, then wait what for? Same I fear in the Sharada Chit Case of West Bengal. At the end of the day, evidence would be lacking. But I am confident with Narada Sting, accused and culprits will have the same meaning. Because, those who were caught in our camera had admitted receiving the BRIBE!